Written by: Ethan Pham
What if we can fight climate change not by waiting for new inventions, but by building affordable homes near public transit? Up until this summer, I hadn’t considered how the locations of our communities are crucial to protecting our environment.
My name is Ethan Pham, and I am a high school student studying at Milpitas High School. Similar to other students of my age, I was not aware of how intertwined climate change is in every aspect of our society. I had initially felt excluded from policy conversations and advanced logistics regarding climate change. However, this summer completely altered my view on the matter.
I distinctly remember the temperature exceeded 105 degrees on my recent trip to France, thus making walking around the town a tiring and unappealing affair. The most frightening thing about the heat, though, was seeing how my grandparents were struggling with their health due to the intense weather changes in their home for several decades. This was the first time that climate change was not just another headline, but a tangible reality.
Having experienced all of this, I have realized that taking actions against climate change is not only the way to deal with natural disasters, but also to stop making them worse. Although it is obvious how important technologies like electric cars and renewable energy are when it comes to reducing our carbon footprint, there are some other ways.
At first glance, it may be hard to link affordable housing to climate change. However, the two topics have a strong correlation; the construction of housing in areas where one can easily access schools, places of work, BART stations, and public transport means that there is an option other than driving daily. With less traffic, there would be fewer emissions and cleaner air. And emissions, frankly, contribute more than 39 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in California.
In Santa Clara County overall, increasing housing prices continue to force many households further away from where they work and learn. Longer commutes mean more time in your car, more congestion on our roads, and more carbon in our atmosphere. We cannot solve the problem of the climate crisis without examining the issue of how people are able to afford to live.
Fortunately, Milpitas is already showing that there is an alternative to this scenario. The city of Milpitas has been working toward planning for 6,713 additional housing units by 2031, which will include a number of them close to educational institutions, job opportunities, and public transportation facilities. Such initiatives as Mosaic Court indicate that providing affordable homes can be conducive to community development while decreasing dependence on automobiles.
But these goals are fragile without proper accountability regarding the implementation process. To me, Milpitas should further invest in affordable housing adjacent to public transport, add more bike lanes, create better footpath networks, and make more room for public transport on major roads like Main Street. Overall, these changes would make Milpitas more walkable, and accessible to older and younger members of our community who don’t have access or ability to drive a car. Milpitas should also fix old roads whose lane markings have become too worn out, to ensure that our roads are safe for pedestrians and drivers. Furthermore, I believe that youth should have more involvement in city planning, as we are the ones who are going to face the consequences of the decisions made today the longest.
So far, Milpitas has done a good job at tree preservation and planting trees, but creating walkable neighborhoods with local commerce, meeting spaces, and public transit will help create a sustainable environment.
Some argue that building more homes in Milpitas would create more congestion or create a cultural diversion from the aesthetics and culture of our community. However, when planning mobility hubs (housing that is near transit) to mitigate long commutes and excessive land dedicated to parking spaces, we become less dependent on our cars than before. Thus, smart growth and inevitable growth in our community will not be the problem, but rather an opportunity for necessary change.
Everyone says that young people are the leaders of the future. I disagree; it is our duty to be the leaders of today.The decisions that are made today will dictate our future; we should have a say in what that future looks like. During my stay in France, I learned that climate change is not something that we face in the future but something that affects all families right now. Milpitas should continue making efforts toward developing affordable transit-oriented communities and learn that sometimes some of the most powerful climate solutions do not begin with a scientific discovery. Sometimes, they begin with the places we call home.






The gist of the article is that our Climate Crisis is already hurting us, and building affordable housing near transit is a way of reducing our CO2 emission that are guaranteeing even worse climate disasters ahead.
The author’s solution, Transit Oriented Development (TOD), has been a popular approach to reducing emissions. It has a fundamental flaw in that TODs focus on small areas, and depend upon widely-spaced mass transit stations. In Milpitas, the Metro Area TOD (half-mile radius around the transit center) is about 0.8 square mile, or just 5% of Milpitas (14 sq-miles), leaving lots of opportunities unserved by good public transit.
I agree we need to make “Milpitas more walkable, and accessible to older and younger members of our community who don’t have access or ability to drive a car.” Rather than encouraging them to move into that 5% of Milpitas, or leaving them reliant on a bus system with long headways (time between buses), let’s explore the benefits of Personal Rapid Transit (PRT, or podcars).
LoopWorks is working on a demonstration PRT project that will answer lot of questions, including whether we can grow that 5% by providing 24/7 non-stop service to areas of the city outside the TOD.
At https://milpitasprt.com/ learn about what the author calls “an opportunity for necessary change.”
This young man created a well thought out and organized paper. Well done! It’s nice to see our young scholars celebrated!
The whole basis it rests on is the assumption that anthropomorphic climate change is real. Climate change is real. Man made climate change isn’t. Even the IPCC backtracked on climate change. IPCC Quietly Admits Its Doomsday Climate Scenarios Were ‘Implausible’
https://www.gulf-insider.com/un-climate-panel-quietly-admits-its-doomsday/
How many times in the last 100 years has there been a “climate crisis”? I have a list of 50 since 1890. It’s the crisis du jour. If you look at the numbers (remove the emotion) in the last 5,ooo,ooo years of earth’s history of temperature and CO2 concentration, we are below average. Yes, it may be rising quickly. That’s fine as long as it stays near average. Yes, I have lots of science to back up this assertion. It’s soaked into our society as deep as Covid was. I’ve been studying this so please, send me any scientific reports, not projections or opinions, that show me wrong. I’d love to read it.